· Doctors are obligated to treat patients,
including those that are HIV-positive;
· The inmate was initially treated and
advised that he should first wait to see if his broken bone would set
satisfactorily after being repositioned and splinted;
· He returned to the hospital the following
day and requested the operation to set the bone using metal screws and a plate;
· Pending this operation, he was admitted to
the hospital and placed in a ward for [HIV?]-infected patients;
· In Bolivia it is the patient's
responsibility to purchase in advance the materials that will be used in the
operation, and apparently the patient was aware of this;
· At the scheduled time for the operation
the patient did not have the necessary materials ready, for which the operation
did not proceed.
· The doctor did not refuse to treat the
patient because the patient was HIV-positive.
I have no reason to doubt this version of events, in which case the Abra protesters' support for their fellow inmate misrepresented the doctor's reasons for acting as he did. In one newspaper account Celima Torricoa, the Government Secretary for Human Development, said that the incident would be investigated thoroughly. From those findings I hope to verify that the doctor did not refuse to provide treatment and the inmate was not refused treatment because he happened to be HIV-positive.
I regret having left a false impression for a week but the combination of my illness and our having lost internet access during all of that time (just restored an hour ago) made it difficult until now to post an update.
No comments:
Post a Comment